1952. Effects of Generative AI on scenario thinking
Invited abstract in session TD-61: Behavioural aspects of strategic planning, stream Behavioural OR.
Tuesday, 14:30-16:00Room: Maurice Keyworth G.31
Authors (first author is the speaker)
| 1. | Megan Crawford
|
| Management, Edinburgh Napier University | |
| 2. | Nicholas Rowland
|
| Penn State University | |
| 3. | Luciana Blaha
|
| Edinburgh Business School/Marketing & Operations, Heriot-Watt University | |
| 4. | Elena Fitkov-Norris
|
| Accounting, Finance and Informatics, Kingston University |
Abstract
This project focuses on the role of generative AI (GAI) in scenario thinking. Specifically, this investigation is experimentally testing the impacts of GAI use on the various cognitions that comprise "scenario thinking". The purpose is to help inform the growing use of GAI tools in strategy spaces. GAI is projected to continue growing in popularity as a strategy tool for senior executives and management to aid decision-making (Ferrer I Pico et al, 2025; Garvey & Svendensen, 2024). Yet, available data in support of GAI as an “effective” foresight tool remains minimal with mixed results, and largely focuses on the generative properties of the LLM rather than the human cognitive features. Scenario thinking is the primary cognitive effort employed when engaging in scenario planning (Cairns & Wright, 2011). Scenario thinking is informed by experience, knowledge, higher-order cognitions, problem solving, and more (Schacter, et al. 2017). A series of laboratory-based experiments are measuring the known selection of higher-order cognitive markers to scenario thinking, including creativity, causality, probability, episodic future thinking, mental simulation, parallel thinking, counterfactual thinking, and more (see Epstude, 2008; Guilford, 1950; Hastie, 2015; Torrance, 1988). These experimental studies are part of a larger grounded theory investigation
Keywords
- Behavioural OR
- Decision Theory
- Artificial Intelligence
Status: accepted
Back to the list of papers