EURO-Online login
- New to EURO? Create an account
- I forgot my username and/or my password.
- Help with cookies
(important for IE8 users)
3865. Lagrangean lower bounding and math-heuristics for approximating the set of non-dominated points of a computationally demanding bi-objective MILP
Invited abstract in session WD-37: Multiobjective Mixed-Integer Linear Optimization, stream Multiobjective Optimization.
Wednesday, 14:30-16:00Room: 33 (building: 306)
Authors (first author is the speaker)
1. | Ann-Brith Strömberg
|
Mathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology | |
2. | Gabrijela Obradovic
|
Chalmers University of Technology | |
3. | Felix Held
|
Chalmers University of Technology | |
4. | Kristian Lundberg
|
Saab AB |
Abstract
We consider a computationally demanding bi-objective MILP, arising from an industrial maintenance and workshop scheduling problem subject to a turn–around time contract. Since, for industrial scale instances, this problem cannot be solved in reasonable computing time, we employ (i) so-called job variables in the workshop model, and (ii) a lower bounding procedure based on Lagrangean relaxation of the complicating constraints of an epsilon-constraint scalarized problem combined with math-heuristics to identify approximately non-dominated feasible points. A Lagrangean dual of the scalarized problem is maximized using subgradient optimization, which is shown to provide lower bounding functions of the objective of the scalarazed problem over the domain of the epsilon-constrained objective. As a means to reduce computational complexity we introduce so-called job variables, however resulting in an in-definiteness of the Lagrangean dual variables. This is remedied by aggregating, over jobs, the constraints defining the objective, which in turn entails a relaxation of the scalarized problems in terms of lower optimal values. To mimic the turn–around time contract, the aggregated variables’ values are split into values for the original job variables. The lower bounds computed are, however, still valid, albeit slightly weaker as compared to when constraint aggregation is not employed. A topic for further research is tightening of these lower bounds.
Keywords
- Combinatorial Optimization
- Non-smooth Optimization
- Multi-Objective Decision Making
Status: accepted
Back to the list of papers