EURO 2024 Copenhagen
Abstract Submission

EURO-Online login

3169. Accounting for heuristics in reputation systems. An interdisciplinary approach in aggregation processes

Invited abstract in session WC-40: Experimental economics and game theory 2, stream Experimental economics and game theory.

Wednesday, 12:30-14:00
Room: 96 (building: 306)

Authors (first author is the speaker)

1. René Fahr
Management, Paderborn University
2. Dirk van Straaten
Department Management , Paderborn University
3. Vitalik Melnikov
Software Innovation Campus Paderborn, Paderborn University
4. Eyke Hüllermeier
Institut für Informatik, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München
5. Behnud Mir Djawadi
Department Management , Paderborn University

Abstract

Product ratings help customers to evaluate the quality of a product prior to their purchasing decision in online markets. To overcome information overload, the vast amount of reviews is aggregated to a single scalar value, typically the arithmetic mean. However, customers may not base their purchasing decision on the arithmetic mean but on other aggregation functions such as the amount of 1-star and/or 5-star ratings. Our research question therefore asks to what extent the arithmetic mean really reflects how customers aggregate product ratings. In our incentivized laboratory experiment, participants are shown bundles of different products, and subsequently, asked to rank them according to their preferences. Analyzing the rank data with a Placket-Luce model, we find that the arithmetic mean indeed best explains the obtained data. However, our analysis on an individual level reveals more heterogeneous aggregation patterns. In particular, a significant share of participants exhibits a binary bias. That is, moderate 2-star and 4-star categories get over- and the extreme 1-star and 5-star categories under-weighted. We also observe minor clusters who prefer products which have the lowest amount of 1-star ratings. The way our participants aggregate the ratings is neither affected by variation of provided information nor by individual characteristics such as experience, risk attitudes, or demographics.

Keywords

Status: accepted


Back to the list of papers