EURO-Online login
- New to EURO? Create an account
- I forgot my username and/or my password.
- Help with cookies
(important for IE8 users)
2113. Price Subsidies with or without Physical Procurement: Impact on Quality, Profits, and Welfare
Invited abstract in session TC-24: Agri-Food Supply Chains, stream Sustainable Supply Chains.
Tuesday, 12:30-14:00Room: 83 (building: 116)
Authors (first author is the speaker)
1. | Aysajan Eziz
|
Ivey Business School, Western University | |
2. | Nagesh Gavirneni
|
Johnson School of Business, Cornell University | |
3. | Omkar D. Palsule-Desai
|
India Institute of Management Indore |
Abstract
Newly introduced price subsidy programs without physical procurement have resulted in an increased (vis-à -vis the subsidy programs with physical procurement) preponderance of deliberate quality degradation for certain crops by Indian farmers. The physical procurement of the crop from farmers provides an alternate sales channel to farmers enabling the government to subdue the competition between farmers in the open market. The farmers' deliberate quality degradation may moderate the benefits of the altered competitive structure. The viability of such programs has been questioned, and policymakers are looking for guidance. Using a multi-stage incomplete information-based (Bayesian) game-theoretic model, we comprehensively characterize the farmers’ strategic production and selling decisions. We demonstrate that the government price support with multiple sales channels created by physically procuring the crop improves the producer surplus when the farmers' landholdings are highly disparate and the quality-based competition is lower. A higher minimum support price (MSP), a higher landholding for a farmer producing a high-quality crop, and a lower high-quality crop price premium in the open market improve the consumer surplus, the social surplus, and the average quality of the crops supplied by farmers when the government does not procure the crop physically v/s when it does. We provide guidance to the government exercising caution in selecting MSP and farmer subsidy program.
Keywords
- Behavioural OR
- Developing Countries
- Game Theory
Status: accepted
Back to the list of papers