EURO 2025 Leeds
Abstract Submission

1275. Time preferences in repetitive choices

Invited abstract in session MC-61: Advances in behavioral decision analysis 2, stream Behavioural OR.

Monday, 12:30-14:00
Room: Maurice Keyworth G.31

Authors (first author is the speaker)

1. Pelin Gulum Tas
Engineering Systems and Services, Delft University of Technology
2. Yousef Maknoon
Delft University of Technology
3. Gilberto Montibeller
Business School, University of Bristol
4. Jafar Rezaei
Engineering Systems and Services, Delft University of Technology

Abstract

Research on time preference often relies on behavioral experiments where participants make single-time intertemporal choices (a present versus a future outcome), from which their discount rates are calculated and interpreted. Real-world decisions unfold dynamically, shaped by repeated choices and long-term considerations, requiring decision-makers to broaden their perspective. To capture this dynamic nature, we designed an experiment with two types of scenarios: one framed as a single-time choice, as commonly studied in the literature, and the other as a repetitive choice with the aim of promoting holistic thinking. In total, 277 participants were randomly assigned to either a gain or loss version of these scenarios, completing four conditions that varied by decision type (single-time versus repetitive) and outcome magnitude (small versus big). Results indicate that extending the evaluation environment and motivating individuals to consider the decision repetition lead to choices favoring long-term benefits over immediate outcomes. Participants exhibited lower discount rates in repetitive scenarios than in single-time ones, suggesting that discounting behavior is, at least, partially influenced by the setting in which participants are asked to perform intertemporal trade-offs. These findings have important implications for facilitators when helping individuals make informed choices by reducing present bias and for researchers investigating factors that shape time preferences.

Keywords

Status: accepted


Back to the list of papers